Film vs. digital: the most contentious debate in the film world, explained Why knowing how a movie was shot is so important before you go to the theater. showing pixel level resolution), Nikon D850 (14-24) (nearest neighbour uprez - i.e. Photos from (and of) 8x10" large format cameras. We were not trying to be as technical as our last tests as these were more about ‘in the field’ use and the numbers from the previous test probably tell us the theoretical results. 2. compare results on screen - good for pixel peepers 3. compare prints and projected pictures - actually gives useful information for the photographer 8x10 vs digital (a gallery comparison for your own eyes) Are you going through Vegas to shoot landscape in the great SW? Our final analysis had the 8x10 film coming in at about 300-600 megapixels. SP-Rack: project launch on Indiegogo! New technique for loading the film holders. So, Al Simmons and I took a walk around Glencoe for an afternoon accompanied by James Fortune who just happened to have a D850 which we were able to include in the test. Our final comparison pictures were taken below the house in the last photograph (I like to call it Hamish Macinnes’ house instead Jimmy Saville’s as Hamish is a nice bloke who actually lived in the house. Recently Joe Cornish has upgraded the new IQ4 150mp sensor and TeamWork approached us about going out and testing the camera in various ways. Here are the possible ways to compare. What is more, the Phase One system has become quite ‘friendly’ now, with its fast frame rate live view, focus peaking, huge dynamic range, very little colour distortion and electronic shutter, there are very few reasons why any sane person would want to use an 8x10 instead. We’ve covered a huge amount of this territory in our previous comparison article which I’ll link to at the end of this but in summary, 8x10 trounces the Phase One camera for absolute detail but unless you’re printing over three meters wide then it’s not going to be visible. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. The problem of digital vs film is that customers expectations are not beyond what small digital formats deliver (mediocre quality). If you shoot with a 4x5, 5x7 or other reducing back, or with a larger-than-8x10 format, please check out the Large Format pool instead. Here are the contents of the area starting with the Phase version. With film they could just cut it to any size. A view camera is so much more capable than a slr....*in the right hands*. These cookies do not store any personal information. If normal 100 ISO 35mm film (and it did) topped out at about 10mp for resolution, then 8x10, even slide film … Sometimes a lack of faff beats everything! 8x10 Velvia 50 . 8x10) film--yet In reply to thejaybird • Dec 26, 2007 thejaybird wrote: This becomes even more pronounced as you move up in format, and also keep in mind that a lens is expected to produce an image circle a fair bit larger than the film. The problem with large format digital is the cost. Is it enough of a difference to warrant the high cost of shooting film Then again, photography is an art, not a science, and many people make their choices of medium based on how the process works for them creatively. Digital has more dynamic range than film, and the autofocus on the medium formats can be a plus on certain images. With medium format 6x6 film you get 56 x 56 = 3,136 sq mm, which is 282 megapixel. I figure my 8x10 outfit, with film and lenses weighed in just shy of 100lbs. Arthur Morris switching from Canon to Nikon D850, (You must log in or sign up to reply here. In my 2800 drums, the few ridges behind the film don't actually touch the film, and have not been a problem, … There’s also the small matter of expense to take into account as well. Before people say that the Nikon or Phase photos aren’t sharp, this is because it’s been massively uprezzed in order to compare at all. Like. If you shoot sports or wildlife, I don't think a view camera is capable at all, regardless of whose hands it is in. You can find the results of that test here but the general summary was that the 80mp and 5x4 were quite close in many ways (more fine detail in 5x4, more punchy contrast in the 80mp - prints looked similar). It will accept two film holders, allowing you to process two sheets of 8x10 film at a time. I was illustrating how regardless of medium, for a good result one must be deliberate and careful. I’ll wait! Large format, both film-based and digital, is still used for many applications, such as landscape photography, advertising photos, fine-art photography, scientific applications and generally for images that will be enlarged to a high magnification while requiring a high level of detail. Februar 2020, 08:15. SP-Rack: standing tall; drip dry. The red area is quite small on this comparison but hopefully, you can still see it. Re: there's no digital equivalent to large format (e.g. Amateur Photographer who plays with big cameras and film when in between digital photographs. To get the right comparison, I was using a Toyo 810MII camera with a Schneider 110mm Super Symmar XL lens to try to match the field of view of the IQ4 150mp sensor on the Phase XT camera and the 23mm Rodenstock Digaron HR lens. This is Canon 5DMiii with Canon 85mm F1.8 vs Canon film camera and same lens. For me though, the real benefits of 4x5, 5x7 and 8x10 systems are the ease with which camera movements can be made, the beauty of lenses that render beautifully to the corners, the accessibility of lenses that have ‘character’ that you just can’t use on smaller formats, the colour reproduction of Velvia 50 (still hard to match, even with ninja photoshop skills), the relinquishment of the continuous upgrade cycle and the pleasure of really knowing your equipment. obsolescence. Every other film vs. digital comparison I've seen finished in digital, and unfortunately they were always using a cheap consumer scanner to convert the film to digital. Film Photography Costs and Prices Development, Scanning and Printing; From 35mm to Large Format 14 min read by Dmitri and scott.. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. Film vs. digital are different mediums, just like pastel and watercolor. The Phase cameras have reached a functionality and usability point that means using medium format digital is no longer a fight with the equipment. Well, of course it's possible to record more detail on 8x10 inch film than 35mm digital; the former has almost 60 times the area of the latter. My MF outfit and my digital rig weigh in at 26 lbs each, for me it isn't a real big decision. digital megapixel equivalent (8x10 film) = 600 * (lpm1.6 / 80 lpm) 2 (eqn 4) Further, for color film, digital Bayer sensors record one color per sensor element (pixel), thus color detail is less and one needs higher numbers of pixels to match the color resolution of film. These are very similar angles of view as you’ll see in the test images. On Landscape is part of Landscape Media Limited , a company registered in England and Wales . Check out our film vs digital video to see how mirrorless compares to old school photography. Kodak E100G). Offline. 3; 25. Our final analysis had the 8x10 film coming … The real issue here is consideration of cameras / process. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. At 11x14, I would expect everyone to start picking the digital images. Here’s the view as taken with the IQ4 150mp followed by the photograph from the 8x10 camera. Und was wird aus diesem Wunderteil mit 150 MP nach ein Paar Jahren????? This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. End frame: Evening Tracks, Swaledale by Garry Brannigan, Roundtable Discussion on the Environment for Landscape Photographers, https://www.onlandscape.co.uk/2011/12/big-camera-comparison/, https://www.onlandscape.co.uk/2011/12/camera-test-editors-commentary/, https://www.onlandscape.co.uk/2011/12/big-camera-comparison-comments/. You can see here that the 8x10 photograph shows no vignetting as this was taken on Fuji Pro160S film and needed no filters. If that's pinhole or 8x10 it doesn't matter a damn. Use whatever makes you happy! Getting a sharp result from 8x10 is no mean feat, what with sagging film, camera movement, trying to use smaller apertures to keep sharpness, fighting with a metre cube camera, carrying a 20+kg backpack etc, etc. Great Savings & Free Delivery / Collection on many items It's a monster: over 12" high and 14" long and holds almost two liters of solution. Since then, there have been lots of improvements in camera sensors and obviously very little movement in film technology. Buy 8x10" Camera Film and get the best deals at the lowest prices on eBay! And again, here is a version zoomed in a little further to show fine detail differences. 1. count lines - should give us the absolute peak resolution of the film files. We’ve talked about our general reactions to the camera in a previous article, but we were also interested in how it compared with 8x10 film being as things were getting close in our previous print comparison. It's not easy, but it's doable. Here is our first comparison at zoom level one. By … p.s. Habe … Can You Tell the Difference? ... 18 240 220 8x10 Film: Film Fuji Velvia 50 - - 18 960 860 The above table shows Digital SLRs (DSLRs) with larger sensors have a clear advantage over digital point and shoot cameras, which are slightly above slow speed 35mm film. The first prototype of the SP-2810 should arrive next week. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. A digital camera would have to be 156 megapixels to give you the same kind of detail as 35mm film. And of course, this is just 35 mm; with medium and large format you get even more detail, and the larger you keep going the possibilities keep skyrocketing. All that happened back in 2013, so D4/D800 days. But one of the big reasons we made the test was a reaction to an article in Luminous Landscape declaring that the IQ180 cameras now beat 8x10 film and to cut a long, laborious and geeky story short, the answer was “no they don’t”. When comparing digital to film (lets say 12 megapixel APS-C digital to 35mm film), in theory, I would expect that when comparing images at say 6x9 or 8x10 (with a decently fine grained film) people would not be able to tell the difference. Discussion in 'Nikon' started by alastairanderson, Feb 16, 2018. Before you scroll down to the next section of this article, try to guess which one is which. To get a better idea if you’re on a smaller screen, we zoomed in on the area around the road sign. If you look at the small red outline near the middle of the picture, this is where we’ll be doing the comparison. Even today's most beastly medium format cameras top out at 100 megapixels, and the size of their sensors pale in comparison to the behemoth footprint of an 8x10 film … Bill did an experiment during our shoot-out where he asked us to manually focus several of the images as best we could. Joe Cornish will write about his own medium format pathway a future article but we have discussed the falling away of MF digital hurdles as each new camera gets released. We’ve also included James Fortune’s photograph from his Nikon D850 with the 14-24 lens. 2. The Epigraphic Survey | The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, https://www.schneideroptics.com/pdfs/photo/LensCharts.pdf, https://petapixel.com/2013/02/08/david-burnetts-speed-graphic-photos-of-the-london-2012-olympics/, Ha! Phase One IQ 180. (Barely) doable is very different from being capable, and I also wonder what kind of results you got. It was a bit of as mess as I’d forgotten they were draining it to repair the dam, ah well this is a resolution test so no problem. https://www.onlandscape.co.uk/2011/12/big-camera-comparison-comments/. since we performed our mammoth “Big Camera Comparison”. Aber ein korrekter Vergleich sieht so aus: Ein 8x10 Zoll Film gegen einen 8x10 Zoll Chip. Our following test took us to the top of Glencoe from a spot called “The Study”. Here’s a repeat of the side by side comparison with a quick photograph of the test scene first. However, that didn’t tell the whole story as 5x4 film came in at a potential 200+ megapixels and yet the IQ280 files printed just as good. My thinking being that I could make contact prints directly from the negative. Discussion in 'Film and Processing' started by mitchell b. cook, Mar 24, 2007. mitchell b. cook. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. I suppose that he refers to Scott Kelby - there's a video out there he made explaining his reasons (better high ISO performance of the Canon being one strangely enough); sharpness/resolution isn't even mentioned once in the video. With respect to the question of uneven development, the 3000 Expert series Very Large Format film drums (for larger than 8x10) differ from the 2800 drums only in the way the NON-EMULSION side is processed. Also the website that is comparing film vs digital is called the darkroom and is selling I shoot film t shirts and develop and scans film so I’m calling B.S on this comparison. For 8x10 film it still is, but recording "grain clumps" and grain at multiple depths in the film isn't the same as actually having the resolution some claim for film. (Click on the above image to download the full size rendering.) Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. My research shows about 1.6 times more pixels are needed to record the color detail of film. I've shot basketball with a Speed Graphic. The cost model of digital cameras is radically different from the cost model of film cameras. 8x10 is an amazing format, the film comes in sheets that are 52 times larger than a single 35mm frame. Here’s the overall view from the Phase and 8x10 cameras. https://www.onlandscape.co.uk/2011/12/big-camera-comparison/ Erhaltene Likes 94 Beiträge 808. PS: Eine gute 8x10 Kamera wird auch nach Jahren einen Wert haben. Just multiply by 2.25 (crop factor squared). This guide examines the costs of 35mm, instant, and large format film media. And a final high resolution comparison of the 8x10 Velvia and Phase One IQ4 150mp here's the writing on the road sign from Glencoe. The following is a zoomed view of the point of focus for both cameras which is shown on the Phase camera by a red outline. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Hence our first photograph was taken at Glencoe Lochan. he says glowing things about the sharpness of the 28-300, so I'm not sure how I'd judge his idea of "sharp". Personally, I love using the 8x10 though. Ernie M. says: February 10, 2020 at 6:35 pm . This is 100% crop, the "scan" is just a shot of the film with the 5Dmiii and a macro lens using ipad as lightsource. Alles andere ist ein Schwindel. Good chance you will come away with your head spinning with inspiration to shoot and maybe even be propelled to take … https://www.onlandscape.co.uk/2011/12/camera-test-editors-commentary/ 5 months ago permalink. Registered Office: 1, Clarke Hall Farm, Aberford Road, WF1 4AL. Browse On Landscape on your Tablet, iPad or Desktop, Robert Hewitt chooses one of his favourite images. With the decrease in capture size from … It feels like you’re really ‘working’ something and the satisfaction of a good result can be directly proportional to how hard it was to make it. You can see that although the Nikon isn't pixel perfect, the IQ is about as good as you'll get. The 8x10 was used with a graduated filter but obviously the holder vignetted badly. showing pixel level resolution). What you can do with digital is, however, stiching, which should allow such material to be reproduced with a digital camera, given that it stays still during the course of … Once in a Blue Moon Photo Contest, how to enter; What about 8x10 or 5x7? One thing to keep in mind is that just due to optical limits, even the best large format lenses tend to be somewhat lower resolution than their smaller format counterparts. Hi Everyone. Amateur Photographer who plays with big cameras and film when in between digital photographs. SmartLid: digital tools for an analog world; SP-257A: processing 5x7 in the SP-445; The Product Development Process and the SP-445; Quick fix for old O-rings; Film Washing myths. A $1,500 Nikon scanner and my $3,000 Minolta scanner are both cheap consumer scanners, as is the $10,000 Imacon, all intended for use by end user-owners. When we arrived at the study in Glencoe, the conditions were amazing and I quickly shot a hand held, five frame panorama on my Sony. If they ever figured out a way to really evenly distribute grains in the film, then resolution would still be higher than any digital camera. This website uses cookies to improve your experience. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. … He then took one with the autofocus — and in every case, the autofocused image was sharper than our mortal efforts. It’s now owned by a plumber from Inverness!).
Holley Terminator X Injector List, Mab Model D Disassembly, Musiccast Vs Sonos 2020, Game Dog Bloodlines, Narrowboat Roof Collar, Coolster 125cc Atv Review, Sword Simulator 2 Script Pastebin, Wwe 2k20 Draft Simulator,